What you get
A frozen sample of a 12-panelist guideline round — this is exactly what the tool renders.
Sample outputUse a slice thickness ≤ 1.5 mm for nodules < 10 mm. Consensus · FORP1
Discharge a stable solid nodule after 12 months of follow-up. No consensus↻ continue — re-vote
From diagnostic algorithms to treatment recommendations
The same engine, the full GRADE range — direction (for / against) and strength (strong / conditional) follow the panel’s consensus and the evidence certainty.
Sample output · treatment guidelineOffer adjuvant osimertinib after complete resection of stage IB–IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Consensus · FOR
Routinely add adjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitor to osimertinib in EGFR-mutated disease. Consensus · AGAINST
Extend adjuvant osimertinib beyond 3 years in high-risk resected disease. Consensus · FOR
A treatment guideline also makes the impact quantitative — projected NNT, survival, toxicity, or cost per recommendation — which can feed the importance/priority ranking. (Two reference guidelines are in progress: a diagnostic pulmonary-nodule guideline and a lung-cancer treatment guideline.)
What it does
- RAND/UCLA two-region consensus — median, IQR, distribution, and a state (consensus for/against · uncertain · no consensus) with a configurable threshold and a disagreement rule.
- Delphi rounds — round-by-round trajectory, stability between rounds, and a stop rule (consensus, stable “won’t converge”, or round cap).
- Importance × feasibility priority map — a 7-cut quadrant plot that ranks an implementation priority list (do-first → deprioritise).
- Chance-corrected ordinal agreement — interval Krippendorff’s α across the statement set, more honest than IQR alone.
- GRADE / EtD recommendations — consensus + evidence certainty become a recommendation: strong “recommend” or conditional “suggest”.
- Between-round feedback — a per-panelist anonymous feedback file (their prior vote + the group distribution) to run the next round.
- Anonymous & private by design — aggregates only, no panelist ever named; the AI is never a panelist; nothing uploads (no network calls at all).
- Part of the evidence ladder — keyed to the same protocol the rest of the Vahtian house uses, so screening (ReviewVahti) and consensus (GuidelineVahti) line up.
Who it’s for
Early access
GuidelineVahti is complete and in early access. Pilot partners welcome — pricing on request.
Request early access →